Publications
๐๐ง๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ธ ๐ง๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ โ ๐ ๐จ๐๐โ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ด๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฎ๐๐๐น๐ฒ ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ถ๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐ฎ๐บ๐ฒ ๐งต
06/09/2025

After 24 years of litigation, Japanese lifestyle brand MUJI has lost its trademark battle over โๆ ๅฐ่ฏๅโ in China. The Supreme Peopleโs Court ruled in favor of Beijing Miantian Textile Co., Ltd., which owns the mark for textile goods in Class 24.
Why did MUJI lose? The case highlights the consequences of Chinaโs โfirst-to-fileโ system and the importance of early, comprehensive trademark registration. MUJIโs failure to secure its Chinese name across all relevant classes back in 1999 has now limited its ability to use the name on products like towels and bed linens in the PRC.
Our IP Prosecution Team members, Valerie Suen and Winnie Ho, break down the implications of this decision and share practical insights for brand owners navigating Chinaโs trademark landscape. A must-read for anyone expanding into the region
Why did MUJI lose? The case highlights the consequences of Chinaโs โfirst-to-fileโ system and the importance of early, comprehensive trademark registration. MUJIโs failure to secure its Chinese name across all relevant classes back in 1999 has now limited its ability to use the name on products like towels and bed linens in the PRC.
Our IP Prosecution Team members, Valerie Suen and Winnie Ho, break down the implications of this decision and share practical insights for brand owners navigating Chinaโs trademark landscape. A must-read for anyone expanding into the region
AUTHORS
No data was found