Apologizing for Half-Life
I’m wrong. Something with me is wrong. Apparently you have to stop writing reviews. After all, what is changing in prose, something does not work out in the field of reviews. I sit down and start writing. There are some thoughts, but they make up a smaller part of my reviews. Basically, I write what came to mind just, and really not thought out and not meaningful. This does not justify me in any way, and you can rightly continue to minute me, but I recognize my not right. My words were cutting. The Half-Life universe is magnificent, interesting and I did not understand that Half-Life is primarily a game. The game should be interactive, this is the meaning. And the fact that in any other form of art is a terrible sin (a faceless and uninteresting main character), in the games good, GG should be a player, and not someone else. This is the meaning of games. We do not play in order to find out the story and manage the model, we play in order to feel like someone else, not the best, but just to others. A soldier, a hero, a brave pilot or racer, or even a bandit. In order to just save the world, fall in love with the most beautiful and perfect girl in the world, go behind the wheel of a car or an airplane, etc.D. Test what we never experienced, and we will hardly test. Yes, and we will want to experience it in real life? I think not, because the zombie apocalypsis and the invasion of aliens are good only on the screens of monitors and TVs, but in books. Or shoot at passers -by. Let some things remain on the other side of the monitor.
I’m wrong. And I like the situation that arose around my review and me. I want to live in the world. Excuse me, all the fans of Half-Life, who offended my post. It may be too late to do something, and this post will be taken negatively, with hostility, but it is worth trying. I am ready to listen to any proposal for my review of the portal two. Maybe it needs to be removed? Or cut some parts? Or completely redo it? Decisions are you.
(There was a Flash player, but since 2020, Flash has not been supported by browsers)
The best comments
We have a kind of democracy, ne? Your opinion, this Lemeng does not like it that someone has a personal position on a particular issue. Do not pay attention to them and do everything the way you yourself think it is necessary!
Moreover, I mean not the post that https://1redcasino.uk/ for some reason caused a ton of anger and this. Because all these pathos apologies Now Absolutely nothing. You are all interesting. I would not apologize in your place for what is written more or less competently, but for something else. for clinging to words, Excessive Before*Providation to literacy, putting another person with an idiot and so on. I also noticed that if someone can put an “interlocutor” with an idiot or to insult otherwise, then this is called a competent triggerlINGUS AND ONLY ONLY DIRECT. competent TROlInga does not happen. Why offend, or at least try to offend a person? It really cannot exist calmly and amicably? But I guess why everything is so. I don’t know why, but almost all of you, when you are on blogs, increases at times your favorite ChSV and you immediately begin to consider yourself smarter than all. this is wrong.
The question is not to me … no one wanted to offend!
Just minute the post, only because a person has an opinion that differs from the opinion of Bolshoi, this is not buzzing!
We went. As you can see from my nickname already, I am still an ardent fan of Half. I saw the article “NOT ARE WHAT” OK, read. It is written competently, purely personal opinion, and with the author clearly sees his position. There would be a review – perhaps I would belp streams of hatred, and basically not because “he offended Half and the nyashka Freeman,” but because I will be indignant every time a person writes “personal opinion” and impersonates the review. Do not drive into the head that if I had taken the review to write, you need to think wider, and work more. I can take the game “XXX” and write a review – “Huita“. And what is not your review?
The second thought. Whatever people you are, one way or another, you should reckon with another opinion. You were filled with trololo from top to bottom – it happens. But I was wildly surprised that people who showed themselves … people, suddenly, from their pedestal, you began to scream not right and article UG.
And the third part, final. Although you like the resource, you will not be pleased with everyone. Disputes give birth to truth, stupid disputes give birth idiots Zhubaktsov. And bursting out suddenly, I will be everywhere and everywhere, as far as possible, all these stupid disputes are suppressed. Yes, they will not love me for this and minute me. But I love when they don’t love me.
P.S. If all this was all the farce, I applaud standing. They would apologize. But not everyone has the strength to apologize.
Leave the review as it is. Change nothing. It was your opinion, let it stay. Otherwise when you write. Do not rush. Wrote, leave for a couple of days, then read it, it will be better. 🙂
I think you are too high about yourself. You, exclusively because not everyone agrees with you, imagines himself a sage, whose truth was not recognized. Something you have, bloggers, your head is happening when you come here.
